Apr
12
Counting the Omer: Christian Orthodoxy vs. Orthopraxy
Sun, 04/12/2009 - 15:46
I came upon a stray tweet from someone I follow, which lead me on a search that led to an interesting blog entry asking "Why don't Christians count the Omer?" Counting the Omer, if you don't know, is a Jewish tradition of counting the 50 days between Passover (the liberation from slavery) and the holiday, Shavu'ot, which commemorates the giving of the Torah to the people of Israel. If you don't know (I didn't,) Shavu'ot and Pentecost are on the same day.
I find the parallels really fascinating. Passover - a celebration of liberation from slavery, and Shavu'ot, a celebration of God's giving of the Torah. Holy Week and Easter, the commemoration of Jesus' death and resurrection, and Pentecost, the commemoration of the coming of the Holy Spirit. Of course, it all makes a lot of sense. Jesus, and all of his earliest followers, were Jews, and lived and practiced that tradition.
In my long knowledge of Jewish tradition (having grown up in Great Neck, and having had many Jewish friends over the years) and my early seminary days of learning about the Hebrew Bible, and studying Kabbalah, I have always been struck by what is (besides the obvious) the major difference between Christianity and Judaism - orthodoxy vs. orthopraxy.
"The word orthodox, from Greek orthodoxos "having the right opinion," from orthos ("right, true, straight") + doxa ("opinion, praise", related to dokein, "thinking"), is typically used to mean adhering to the accepted or traditional and established faith, especially in religion." (From Wikipedia)
"Orthopraxy is a term derived from Greek (ὀρθοπραξις) meaning "correct action/activity", and is a religion that places emphasis on conduct, both ethical and liturgical, as opposed to faith or grace etc.This contrasts with orthodoxy, emphasizing a correct belief, and ritualism, the use of rituals." (From Wikipedia)
So why don't we, as Christians, Count the Omer? Of course, this is a huge theological question - why have we, in large part, completely substituted practice with belief? In some corners (not so small) of Christianity, it doesn't matter if you preach sinfulness of gays and lesbians while having gay sex (and repenting later,) beat your wife, focus on getting rich, or kill other human beings, as long as you believe what is considered "right" you're, in that way of thinking, going to heaven. And no manner of right action or practice, whether it be nonviolence, love, compassion or ritual or contemplation, matters, if you don't have the right beliefs. It seems really hard for me to imagine that the one, a Jew, who said things like "love your neighbor as yourself," and lived the life of radical compassion and love that He did, would think that made a whole lot of sense.
Progressive Christians have begun the process of moving ourselves away from orthodoxy, but I do think sometimes we suffer some of the same symptoms. As long as people think like us, they get to be counted as part of us. Otherwise, they don't. I think Christians need a lot more orthopraxy and a lot less orthodoxy of all kinds. What's most important to me is how I behave, how I live, and how I live out, every day, my relationship with the One I call God. So from now until Shavu'ot/Pentecost, I'm Counting the Omer, in my own way.
Very interesting and insightful read. It is easy as a fellow Christian to hope that all will go to Heaven (that is the orthodoxy speaking) and humbling to remember that is a combination of actions and faith and that we are not saved by faith alone. (And "faith" may very well not necessarily mean "Christian faith".) Thanks again!
I think that part of the issue for me is "what is belief"? Or the 'doxy' part... I personally feel called to two things: practice, and question. You know the old adage, "certainty is the opposite of faith."
But yes, certainly, the eightfold path is a way of looking at this as well - what is the structure of our practice - what supports it? How does our faith support our practice, and our practice support our faith?
Aondering, as well, how this thinking ties to the eightfold path, which seems to bring orthodoxy and orthopraxy together. Is there a way to use both to strengthen each?
But of course, you're right about the Reformation. I've always thought that the Reformation threw the baby out with the bathwater when they basically eliminated contemplative practice. And it's taken many years (and a well-known Catholic priest - Father Thomas Keating) to bring contemplative practice back to many protestants.
And yes, orthopraxy does have it's dangers, since we humans seem so able to mess up just about anything... But part of the question is: what's the goal of orthopraxy? Is the goal to "get to heaven" - or some after-life other-worldly goal? Or is it to continually be in right relationship with the God of our understanding? Maybe that's we can temper the danger.
And I do love that story of Rabbi Hillel. One of my favorites, too.
Hmm fascinating! It has me wondering if the emphasis on -doxy isn't a Reformation thing in opposition to works/righteousness - the ultimate in orthopraxy -- where God's grace is literally dependent on our actions. Given that I agree 200% that "faith without works is dead", I wonder if one of the dangers of orthopraxy isn't that it could side into the position of works/righteousness? I agree entirely that how one lives matters most. And that the same act can be fueled by entirely different traditions/beliefs. But I also think that we progressives have been guilty of excluding people as much by what they do as by what they believe.
I love this story -- There were two Rabbis who were seen as rivals, Rabbi Shammai and Rabbi Hillel. The Talmud tells that a gentile came to Shammai saying that he would convert to Judaism if Shammai could teach him the whole Torah in the time that he could stand on one foot. Shammai drove him away with a builder's measuring stick! Hillel, on the other hand, converted the gentile by telling him, "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary. Go and study it."
Love this! And love the idea of moving toward orthopraxy. Beautiful.
Thanks for referencing my article. Cheers.
Post new comment